Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 (GB/T 3077-2015) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is typically used for used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings., while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 69.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 52.5%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
880-1080 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
685-880 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
10-14%
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and NF A35-565 100C6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.