Related Material — 57.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 (GB/T 3077-2015) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 is a 57.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 57.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6
Tensile Strength
1000-1200 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
800-1000 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
9-13%
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6
Used for automotive gears, gearboxes, shafts, pinions, industrial reducers, and heavy machinery components.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6.
Can GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6.
Can GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.