Minimal Match — 39.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 (GB/T 3077-2015) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 58.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 39.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
1000-1200 MPa
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
800-1000 MPa
225 MPa min
Elongation
9-13%
>=19%
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6
Used for automotive gears, gearboxes, shafts, pinions, industrial reducers, and heavy machinery components.
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Can GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
GB/T 3077 17CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.