Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA (GB/T 3077-2015) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 59.5% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Tensile Strength
1080-1280 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
930-1080 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
10-14%
Not specified
Hardness
30-38 HRC
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA
Used for crankshafts, turbine shafts, heavy-duty gears, aircraft landing parts, bolts, and pressure components.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA specifies Ni, Mo, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA specifies Ni, Mo, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 40CrNiMoA and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.