Related Material — 59.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 700 Q235 (GB/T 700-2006) and ASTM A105 (ASTM A105) are both steel grades.
GB/T 700 Q235 is classified under Structural Steel, while ASTM A105 is classified under Carbon Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
GB/T 700 Q235 is typically used for general structural fabrication, bridges, buildings, while ASTM A105 is commonly used for flanges, fittings, valves, pressure piping components, forged pressure vessel parts.
GB/T 700 Q235 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while ASTM A105 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 700 Q235 vs ASTM A105 is a 89.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 59.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 700 Q235
ASTM A105
Tensile Strength
375–500 MPa
485 MPa min
Yield Strength
≥235 MPa
250 MPa min
Elongation
≥26%
≥22%
Hardness
Not specified
≤197 HB
Typical Applications
GB/T 700 Q235
General structural fabrication, bridges, buildings
ASTM A105
Flanges, fittings, valves, pressure piping components, forged pressure vessel parts
Key Differences
Different category: GB/T 700 Q235 is Structural Steel, ASTM A105 is Carbon Steel.
Can GB/T 700 Q235 Be Substituted With ASTM A105?
GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A105 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A105?
Different category: GB/T 700 Q235 is Structural Steel, ASTM A105 is Carbon Steel.
Can GB/T 700 Q235 be substituted with ASTM A105?
GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A105 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.