Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 14959 50HFA (GOST 14959-2016) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS) (India).
As per chemical composition, GOST 14959 50HFA vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 53.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 14959 50HFA
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Tensile Strength
1200-1500 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
1080 MPa min
245 MPa min
Elongation
8% min
>=18%
Hardness
42-50 HRC
Not specified
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Typical Applications
GOST 14959 50HFA
Used for coil springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, washers, and suspension parts.
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Key Differences
GOST 14959 50HFA specifies V which is not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10.
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni, Mo, S, P which are not specified for GOST 14959 50HFA.
Can GOST 14959 50HFA Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
GOST 14959 50HFA and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 14959 50HFA and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
GOST 14959 50HFA specifies V which is not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10. IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni, Mo, S, P which are not specified for GOST 14959 50HFA.
Can GOST 14959 50HFA be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
GOST 14959 50HFA and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.