Minimal Match — 45% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 14959 50HFA (GOST 14959-2016) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 14959 50HFA is typically used for used for coil springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, washers, and suspension parts., while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI) (Italy).
As per chemical composition, GOST 14959 50HFA vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 67.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 45%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 14959 50HFA
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
1200-1500 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
1080 MPa min
400-600 MPa
Elongation
8% min
10-14 %
Hardness
42-50 HRC
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 14959 50HFA
Used for coil springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, washers, and suspension parts.
GOST 14959 50HFA specifies V which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 14959 50HFA.
Can GOST 14959 50HFA Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 14959 50HFA and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 14959 50HFA and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 14959 50HFA specifies V which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6. UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 14959 50HFA.
Can GOST 14959 50HFA be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 14959 50HFA and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.