Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 19281 09G2S (GOST 19281-2014) and AS/NZS 1595 C350 (AS/NZS 1595:1998) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 19281 09G2S is typically used for used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components., while AS/NZS 1595 C350 is commonly used for cold-rolled structural steel sheet; roll-forming, cold-formed structural sections, purlins.
AS/NZS 1595 C350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS) (Australia/New Zealand).
As per chemical composition, GOST 19281 09G2S vs AS/NZS 1595 C350 is a 65.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 19281 09G2S
AS/NZS 1595 C350
Tensile Strength
490-640 MPa
430 MPa min
Yield Strength
345 MPa min
350 MPa min
Elongation
21% min
14% min
Hardness
140-190 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 19281 09G2S
Used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components.
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for AS/NZS 1595 C350.
Can GOST 19281 09G2S Be Substituted With AS/NZS 1595 C350?
GOST 19281 09G2S and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 19281 09G2S and AS/NZS 1595 C350?
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for AS/NZS 1595 C350.
Can GOST 19281 09G2S be substituted with AS/NZS 1595 C350?
GOST 19281 09G2S and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.