Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 19281 09G2S (GOST 19281-2014) and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 (ASTM A1008) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 19281 09G2S is typically used for used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components., while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is commonly used for cold-rolled high-strength structural steel sheet; automotive structural components, cold-formed parts requiring moderate strength.
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is defined under ASTM International (United States).
As per chemical composition, GOST 19281 09G2S vs ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is a 65.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 19281 09G2S
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50
Tensile Strength
490-640 MPa
380 MPa min
Yield Strength
345 MPa min
340 MPa min
Elongation
21% min
14% min
Hardness
140-190 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 19281 09G2S
Used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components.
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50.
Can GOST 19281 09G2S Be Substituted With ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
GOST 19281 09G2S and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 19281 09G2S and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50.
Can GOST 19281 09G2S be substituted with ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
GOST 19281 09G2S and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.