Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 380 St3ps (GOST 380-2005) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 380 St3ps is typically used for structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS) (Australia/New Zealand).
As per chemical composition, GOST 380 St3ps vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 67.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 40.6%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 380 St3ps
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
370-490 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=22%
22% min
Hardness
<=170 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 380 St3ps
structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can GOST 380 St3ps Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
GOST 380 St3ps and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 380 St3ps and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can GOST 380 St3ps be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
GOST 380 St3ps and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.