Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 380 St3ps (GOST 380-2005) and CSA G40.21 480W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 380 St3ps is typically used for structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels, while CSA G40.21 480W is commonly used for heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment..
CSA G40.21 480W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (Canada).
As per chemical composition, GOST 380 St3ps vs CSA G40.21 480W is a 67.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 380 St3ps
CSA G40.21 480W
Tensile Strength
370-490 MPa
590-790 MPa
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
480 MPa min
Elongation
>=22%
Not specified
Hardness
<=170 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 380 St3ps
structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels
CSA G40.21 480W
Heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment.
Key Differences
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for CSA G40.21 480W.
Can GOST 380 St3ps Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 480W?
GOST 380 St3ps and CSA G40.21 480W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 380 St3ps and CSA G40.21 480W?
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for CSA G40.21 480W.
Can GOST 380 St3ps be substituted with CSA G40.21 480W?
GOST 380 St3ps and CSA G40.21 480W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.