Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 380 St3ps (GOST 380-2005) and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 (ASTM A1008) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 380 St3ps is typically used for structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels, while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is commonly used for cold-rolled high-strength structural steel sheet, higher strength grade; automotive structural/reinforcement components, cold-formed high-strength parts.
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is defined under ASTM International (United States).
As per chemical composition, GOST 380 St3ps vs ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is a 67.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 380 St3ps
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80
Tensile Strength
370-490 MPa
570 MPa min
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
550 MPa min
Elongation
>=22%
10% min
Hardness
<=170 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 380 St3ps
structural steelwork, welded assemblies, construction materials, plates, bars, channels
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80.
Can GOST 380 St3ps Be Substituted With ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
GOST 380 St3ps and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 380 St3ps and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
GOST 380 St3ps specifies Cu, Ni, Cr which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80.
Can GOST 380 St3ps be substituted with ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
GOST 380 St3ps and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.