Minimal Match — 43.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 64.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 43.2%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
>=1080 MPa
380-550 MPa
Elongation
>=8%
>=19%
Izod Impact
>=35 J
60 J min
Condition
Case hardening steel, refined and quenched, core properties
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Yield Strength
Not specified
225 MPa min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Key Differences
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.