Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 59.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
>=1080 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Elongation
>=8%
10-14 %
Izod Impact
>=35 J
Not specified
Condition
Case hardening steel, refined and quenched, core properties
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6. UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.