Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 59.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
>=1080 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Elongation
>=8%
Not specified
Izod Impact
>=35 J
Not specified
Condition
Case hardening steel, refined and quenched, core properties
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
NF A35-565 100C6 specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6. NF A35-565 100C6 specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 15Ni13Cr3Mo2 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.