IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 vs EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 (EN 10088-1:2023) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 vs EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 is a 71.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1
EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12
Hardness
255-306 HB
Not specified
Condition
Valve steel, hardened and tempered (Table 6)
Not specified
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 specifies N which is not specified for IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 and EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 and EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12?
EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 specifies N which is not specified for IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X80Cr20Si2Ni1 and EN 10088-1 X15CrNiSi20-12 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.