Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 (IS 1570 (Part 6):1996) and GOST 5950 4H5MFS (GOST 5950-2000) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS) (India).
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 vs GOST 5950 4H5MFS is a 58.5% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2
GOST 5950 4H5MFS
Tensile Strength
Not specified
1350-1650 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
1150 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
9% min
Hardness
Not specified
44-50 HRC
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2
Not documented
GOST 5950 4H5MFS
Used for die casting dies, forging tools, extrusion dies, punches, and hot shear blades.
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 4H5MFS.
GOST 5950 4H5MFS specifies Cr, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 Be Substituted With GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 4H5MFS. GOST 5950 4H5MFS specifies Cr, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2.
Can IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 be substituted with GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
IS 1570 (Part 6) T90V2 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.