Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 (IS 4367:1991) and IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H (IS 1570 (Part 7):1992) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H is a 62% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5
IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H
Tensile Strength
780-930 MPa
>=415 MPa
Yield Strength
590 MPa min
>=205 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Elongation
>=14%
>=30%
Hardness (soft annealed)
<=217 HB
Not specified
Condition
Hardened and tempered
Tubes, N+T, thickness - (first row of Table 3)
Typical Applications
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5
Not documented
IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H
Boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H specifies Cr, Mo which are not specified for IS 4367 37Mn5Si5.
Can IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H?
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H?
IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H specifies Cr, Mo which are not specified for IS 4367 37Mn5Si5.
Can IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H?
IS 4367 37Mn5Si5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 10Mo6H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.