Related Material — 62% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G3131 SPHC (JIS G 3131:2010) and CSA G40.21 300W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
JIS G3131 SPHC is typically used for used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications., while CSA G40.21 300W is commonly used for structural fabrication,bridges,buildings,machinery frames,general construction,welded structures.
JIS G3131 SPHC is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while CSA G40.21 300W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, JIS G3131 SPHC vs CSA G40.21 300W is a 93% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 62%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G3131 SPHC
CSA G40.21 300W
Tensile Strength
270-410 MPa
450-620 MPa
Yield Strength
205 MPa min
300 MPa min
Elongation
28% min
20-23 %
Hardness
95-130 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G3131 SPHC
Used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 300W?
JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 300W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC be substituted with CSA G40.21 300W?
JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.