Related Material — 57.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G3131 SPHC (JIS G 3131:2010) and CSA G40.21 400W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
JIS G3131 SPHC is typically used for used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications., while CSA G40.21 400W is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, bridges, offshore platforms, cranes, pressure vessels, mining equipment..
JIS G3131 SPHC is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while CSA G40.21 400W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, JIS G3131 SPHC vs CSA G40.21 400W is a 86.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 57.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G3131 SPHC
CSA G40.21 400W
Tensile Strength
270-410 MPa
520-690 MPa
Yield Strength
205 MPa min
400 MPa min
Elongation
28% min
Not specified
Hardness
95-130 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G3131 SPHC
Used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications.
CSA G40.21 400W specifies Si which is not specified for JIS G3131 SPHC.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400W?
JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 400W?
CSA G40.21 400W specifies Si which is not specified for JIS G3131 SPHC.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC be substituted with CSA G40.21 400W?
JIS G3131 SPHC and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.