Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G3131 SPHC (JIS G 3131:2010) and GOST 19281 09G2S (GOST 19281-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
JIS G3131 SPHC is typically used for used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications., while GOST 19281 09G2S is commonly used for used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components..
JIS G3131 SPHC is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G3131 SPHC vs GOST 19281 09G2S is a 64.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G3131 SPHC
GOST 19281 09G2S
Tensile Strength
270-410 MPa
490-640 MPa
Yield Strength
205 MPa min
345 MPa min
Elongation
28% min
21% min
Hardness
95-130 HB
140-190 HB
Typical Applications
JIS G3131 SPHC
Used in automotive parts, welded tubes, drums, furniture, brackets, and sheet metal fabrications.
GOST 19281 09G2S
Used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components.
Key Differences
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Si, Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for JIS G3131 SPHC.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC Be Substituted With GOST 19281 09G2S?
JIS G3131 SPHC and GOST 19281 09G2S share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G3131 SPHC and GOST 19281 09G2S?
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Si, Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for JIS G3131 SPHC.
Can JIS G3131 SPHC be substituted with GOST 19281 09G2S?
JIS G3131 SPHC and GOST 19281 09G2S share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.