Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
KS D3867 SCM435 (KS D 3867:2025) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
KS D3867 SCM435 is typically used for shafts,bolts,studs,axles,gears,structural components,fasteners,machine parts, while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
KS D3867 SCM435 is defined under Korean Industrial Standards (KS), originating from South Korea, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, KS D3867 SCM435 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 67.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 30%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
KS D3867 SCM435
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
930-1080 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
785 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
12-15 %
Not specified
Hardness
269-321 HB
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
KS D3867 SCM435
shafts,bolts,studs,axles,gears,structural components,fasteners,machine parts
KS D3867 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can KS D3867 SCM435 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
KS D3867 SCM435 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between KS D3867 SCM435 and NF A35-565 100C6?
KS D3867 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can KS D3867 SCM435 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
KS D3867 SCM435 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.