Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
KS D3867 SCM435 (KS D 3867:2025) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
KS D3867 SCM435 is typically used for shafts,bolts,studs,axles,gears,structural components,fasteners,machine parts, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
KS D3867 SCM435 is defined under Korean Industrial Standards (KS), originating from South Korea, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, KS D3867 SCM435 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 67.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 15.3%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
KS D3867 SCM435
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
930-1080 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
785 MPa min
400-600 MPa
Elongation
12-15 %
10-14 %
Hardness
269-321 HB
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
KS D3867 SCM435
shafts,bolts,studs,axles,gears,structural components,fasteners,machine parts
KS D3867 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can KS D3867 SCM435 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
KS D3867 SCM435 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between KS D3867 SCM435 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
KS D3867 SCM435 specifies Mo which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can KS D3867 SCM435 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
KS D3867 SCM435 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.