Minimal Match — 41.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
SS 14 22 44 2244 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
SS 14 22 44 2244 is typically used for shafts,gears,axles,bolts,forgings,automotive parts,machine components, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
SS 14 22 44 2244 is defined under Swedish Standards (SS), originating from Sweden, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, SS 14 22 44 2244 vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 62.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 41.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
SS 14 22 44 2244
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
700-900 MPa
>=310 MPa
Elongation
11-16 %
>=18%
Hardness
248-320 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for SS 14 22 44 2244.
Can SS 14 22 44 2244 Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
SS 14 22 44 2244 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between SS 14 22 44 2244 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for SS 14 22 44 2244.
Can SS 14 22 44 2244 be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
SS 14 22 44 2244 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.