Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A276/A276M S31000 (ASTM A276/A276M:2017) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A276/A276M S31000 is typically used for stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished), while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
ASTM A276/A276M S31000 is defined under ASTM International (United States).
As per chemical composition, ASTM A276/A276M S31000 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 64.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 66.7%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A276/A276M S31000
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
>=515 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
>=40%
≥40%
Condition
Condition A (Annealed), hot-finished, all sizes (first row printed)
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A276/A276M S31000
Stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished)
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Can ASTM A276/A276M S31000 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
ASTM A276/A276M S31000 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A276/A276M S31000 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A276/A276M S31000 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
ASTM A276/A276M S31000 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.