Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 E295 (EN 10025-2:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 E295 is typically used for hot rolled products of structural steels, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
EN 10025-2 E295 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 E295 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 79.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25.5%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 E295
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
470-610 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
>=295 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=20%
22% min
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 E295
Hot rolled products of structural steels
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-2 E295 specifies N which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 specifies C, Mn, Si which are not specified for EN 10025-2 E295.
Can EN 10025-2 E295 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 E295 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 E295 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 E295 specifies N which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300. AS/NZS 3679.1 300 specifies C, Mn, Si which are not specified for EN 10025-2 E295.
Can EN 10025-2 E295 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 E295 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.