Related Material — 68.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 E335 (EN 10025-2:2019) and EN 10025-2 E295 (EN 10025-2:2019) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 E335 is typically used for hot rolled products of structural steels, while EN 10025-2 E295 is commonly used for hot rolled products of structural steels.
EN 10025-2 E335 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-2 E295 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 E335 vs EN 10025-2 E295 is a 100% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 5.6%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 68.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 E335
EN 10025-2 E295
Tensile Strength
570-710 MPa
470-610 MPa
Yield Strength
>=335 MPa
>=295 MPa
Elongation
>=16%
>=20%
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 E335
Hot rolled products of structural steels
EN 10025-2 E295
Hot rolled products of structural steels
Can EN 10025-2 E335 Be Substituted With EN 10025-2 E295?
EN 10025-2 E335 and EN 10025-2 E295 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 E335 and EN 10025-2 E295?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10025-2 E335 be substituted with EN 10025-2 E295?
EN 10025-2 E335 and EN 10025-2 E295 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.