Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 E360 (EN 10025-2:2019) and CSA G40.21 300W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 E360 is typically used for hot rolled products of structural steels, while CSA G40.21 300W is commonly used for structural fabrication,bridges,buildings,machinery frames,general construction,welded structures.
EN 10025-2 E360 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while CSA G40.21 300W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 E360 vs CSA G40.21 300W is a 85% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 E360
CSA G40.21 300W
Tensile Strength
670-830 MPa
450-620 MPa
Yield Strength
>=360 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=11%
20-23 %
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
EN 10025-2 E360 specifies N which is not specified for CSA G40.21 300W.
CSA G40.21 300W specifies C, Mn which are not specified for EN 10025-2 E360.
Can EN 10025-2 E360 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 300W?
EN 10025-2 E360 and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 E360 and CSA G40.21 300W?
EN 10025-2 E360 specifies N which is not specified for CSA G40.21 300W. CSA G40.21 300W specifies C, Mn which are not specified for EN 10025-2 E360.
Can EN 10025-2 E360 be substituted with CSA G40.21 300W?
EN 10025-2 E360 and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.