Related Material — 66.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S250 (EN 10025-2:2019) and CSA G40.21 400W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S250 is typically used for used for fabricated structures, beams, support frames, machinery bases, towers, and construction components., while CSA G40.21 400W is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, bridges, offshore platforms, cranes, pressure vessels, mining equipment..
EN 10025-2 S250 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while CSA G40.21 400W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S250 vs CSA G40.21 400W is a 96.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 7.1%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 66.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S250
CSA G40.21 400W
Tensile Strength
410-560 MPa
520-690 MPa
Yield Strength
250 MPa min
400 MPa min
Elongation
22-25%
Not specified
Hardness
120-170 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S250
Used for fabricated structures, beams, support frames, machinery bases, towers, and construction components.
Can EN 10025-2 S250 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400W?
EN 10025-2 S250 and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S250 and CSA G40.21 400W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10025-2 S250 be substituted with CSA G40.21 400W?
EN 10025-2 S250 and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.