Related Material — 66.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S275 (EN 10025-2:2019) and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 (ASTM A1008) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S275 is typically used for structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication, while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is commonly used for cold-rolled high-strength structural steel sheet, higher strength grade; automotive structural/reinforcement components, cold-formed high-strength parts.
EN 10025-2 S275 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S275 vs ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 is a 99.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 66.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S275
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80
Yield Strength
275 MPa min (t<=16mm)
550 MPa min
Tensile Strength
410-560 MPa
570 MPa min
Elongation
23% min
10% min
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S275
Structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication
Can EN 10025-2 S275 Be Substituted With ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
EN 10025-2 S275 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S275 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10025-2 S275 be substituted with ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80?
EN 10025-2 S275 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 80 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.