Related Material — 67.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S275 (EN 10025-2:2019) and CSA G40.21 400W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S275 is typically used for structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication, while CSA G40.21 400W is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, bridges, offshore platforms, cranes, pressure vessels, mining equipment..
EN 10025-2 S275 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while CSA G40.21 400W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S275 vs CSA G40.21 400W is a 98.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 7.1%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 67.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S275
CSA G40.21 400W
Yield Strength
275 MPa min (t<=16mm)
400 MPa min
Tensile Strength
410-560 MPa
520-690 MPa
Elongation
23% min
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S275
Structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication
Can EN 10025-2 S275 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400W?
EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 400W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10025-2 S275 be substituted with CSA G40.21 400W?
EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.