Related Material — 65.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S275 (EN 10025-2:2019) and CSA G40.21 480W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S275 is typically used for structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication, while CSA G40.21 480W is commonly used for heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment..
EN 10025-2 S275 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while CSA G40.21 480W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S275 vs CSA G40.21 480W is a 97.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S275
CSA G40.21 480W
Yield Strength
275 MPa min (t<=16mm)
480 MPa min
Tensile Strength
410-560 MPa
590-790 MPa
Elongation
23% min
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S275
Structural beams, columns, bridges, general fabrication
CSA G40.21 480W
Heavy cranes, offshore structures, high-rise building frames, pressure vessels, heavy mining equipment.
Can EN 10025-2 S275 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 480W?
EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 480W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 480W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10025-2 S275 be substituted with CSA G40.21 480W?
EN 10025-2 S275 and CSA G40.21 480W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.