Close Alternative — 82.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-3 S500 (EN 10025-3:2019) and EN 10025-2 S500J0 (EN 10025-2:2019) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-3 S500 is typically used for used in heavy structural sections, mining equipment, bridge fabrication, transport vehicles, and offshore structures., while EN 10025-2 S500J0 is commonly used for hot rolled products of structural steels.
EN 10025-3 S500 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-2 S500J0 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-3 S500 vs EN 10025-2 S500J0 is a 91.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 63.2%.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 82.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-3 S500
EN 10025-2 S500J0
Tensile Strength
590-770 MPa
580-760 MPa
Yield Strength
500 MPa min
>=500 MPa
Elongation
16% min
>=15%
Hardness
190-240 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Typical Applications
EN 10025-3 S500
Used in heavy structural sections, mining equipment, bridge fabrication, transport vehicles, and offshore structures.
EN 10025-2 S500J0
Hot rolled products of structural steels
Key Differences
EN 10025-2 S500J0 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10025-3 S500.
Can EN 10025-3 S500 Be Substituted With EN 10025-2 S500J0?
EN 10025-3 S500 and EN 10025-2 S500J0 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10025-3 S500 and EN 10025-2 S500J0?
EN 10025-2 S500J0 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10025-3 S500.
Can EN 10025-3 S500 be substituted with EN 10025-2 S500J0?
EN 10025-3 S500 and EN 10025-2 S500J0 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.