Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 (EN 10028-2:2017) and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 is typically used for flat products for pressure purposes, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 16Mo3 vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 65.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 19.3%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 16Mo3
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
440-590 MPa
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
>=275 MPa
>=310 MPa
Elongation
>=22%
>=18%
Condition
Usual delivery condition normalized (+N), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Typical Applications
EN 10028-2 16Mo3
Flat products for pressure purposes
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Flat products for pressure purposes
Key Differences
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10.
Can EN 10028-2 16Mo3 Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10.
Can EN 10028-2 16Mo3 be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.