Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 (EN 10028-2:2017) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-2 16Mo3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 56.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-2 16Mo3
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Tensile Strength
440-590 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=275 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=22%
Not specified
Condition
Usual delivery condition normalized (+N), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10028-2 16Mo3
Flat products for pressure purposes
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 specifies P, S, N, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can EN 10028-2 16Mo3 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 specifies P, S, N, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can EN 10028-2 16Mo3 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
EN 10028-2 16Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.