Related Material — 55.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 (GOST 5632-2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is typically used for furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 83.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 55.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Tensile Strength
≥510 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
≥196 MPa
≥210 MPa
Elongation
≥35%
≥45%
Max Service Temp
1050°C
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.