IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB vs EN 10088-1 1.4301

Minimal Match — 27.6% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB (IS 11169 (Part 2):2023) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Stainless Steel category. IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB is typically used for cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, table 11), while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware. IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.

As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 41.5% match. As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%. Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 27.6%.

Frequently Compared With IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB:
EN 10088-1 1.4845 GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 GOST 5632 08X18H10 EN 10088-1 1.4006 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoH GOST 5632 12Kh13 EN 10088-1 1.4401 IS 1570 (Part 7) 11Cr17Ni13W3TiH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12Ni2Mo IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr13H
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
41.5%
MECHANICAL MATCH
0%
OVERALL
27.6%
Specifications
Property IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB EN 10088-1 1.4301
Standard IS 11169 (Part 2):2023 EN 10088-1:2014
Category Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
Al (%) <=0.35 Not specified
B (%) 0.001-0.010 Not specified
C (%) <=0.08 ≤0.07
Cr (%) 13.5-16.0 17.5–19.5
Mn (%) <=2.00 ≤2.00
Mo (%) 1.00-1.50 Not specified
Ni (%) 24.0-27.0 8.0–10.5
P (%) <=0.040 ≤0.045
S (%) <=0.030 ≤0.030
Si (%) <=1.00 ≤1.00
Ti (%) 1.90-2.35 Not specified
V (%) 0.10-0.50 Not specified
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB EN 10088-1 1.4301
Reduction of Area, cold drawn and solution annealed (+AT+C+AT) >=65% (0.8 to 5 mm) Not specified
Tensile Strength, cold drawn and solution annealed (+AT+C+AT) <=780 MPa (0.8 to 2 mm) / <=730 MPa (over 2 to 5 mm) Not specified
Tensile Strength Not specified ≥520 MPa
Yield Strength Not specified ≥210 MPa
Elongation Not specified ≥45%
Hardness Not specified ≤215 HB
Typical Applications
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB
Cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, Table 11)
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB
No active listings currently.
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Sheet → (3 listings)
Thickness: 6–6 mm (0.24–0.24 in)
Width: 1250–1250 mm (49.21–49.21 in)
Length: 2500–3300 mm (98.43–129.92 in)
On M-EX Right Now
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB
0 active listings and RFQs →
EN 10088-1 1.4301
3 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB specifies Al, B, Mo, Ti which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Ni25Cr15Ti2Mo1VB and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.