Minimal Match — 53.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 79.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 53.2%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Tensile Strength
>=485 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=170 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
≥210 MPa
Elongation
>=40% (50 mm)
≥45%
Hardness
<=183 HB; <=88 HRB
≤215 HB
Condition
Annealed, quenched or solution treated plates, sheets and strips (Table 2)
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
Not documented
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.