IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10
Related Material — 61.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS) (India).
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 76.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 33.3%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 61.9%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
>=485 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=170 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
≥205 MPa
Elongation
>=40% (50 mm)
≥40%
Hardness
<=183 HB; <=88 HRB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed, quenched or solution treated plates, sheets and strips (Table 2)
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
Not documented
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.