Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and GOST 5632 12Kh13 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS) (India).
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 vs GOST 5632 12Kh13 is a 62.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
GOST 5632 12Kh13
Tensile Strength
>=485 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
>=170 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Not specified
Elongation
>=40% (50 mm)
Not specified
Hardness
<=183 HB; <=88 HRB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed, quenched or solution treated plates, sheets and strips (Table 2)
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
36–45 (hardened)
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10
Not documented
GOST 5632 12Kh13
Turbine blades, pump shafts, fasteners, cutlery
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 12Kh13.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 12Kh13?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 12Kh13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 12Kh13?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 12Kh13.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 be substituted with GOST 5632 12Kh13?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X02Cr19Ni10 and GOST 5632 12Kh13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.