Minimal Match — 49.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 (JIS G4053:2008) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 is typically used for case hardened gears, shafts, cams, pins, automotive components, while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4053 SMnC420 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 74.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 49.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4053 SMnC420
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
785–980 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Case Hardness HRC
58–62
Not specified
Core Hardness HB
217–277
Not specified
Elongation
≥10%
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
JIS G4053 SMnC420
Case hardened gears, shafts, cams, pins, automotive components
Can JIS G4053 SMnC420 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
JIS G4053 SMnC420 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4053 SMnC420 and NF A35-565 100C6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can JIS G4053 SMnC420 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
JIS G4053 SMnC420 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.