Minimal Match — 49.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 (JIS G4053:2008) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 is typically used for case hardened gears, shafts, cams, pins, automotive components, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
JIS G4053 SMnC420 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4053 SMnC420 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 74.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 49.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4053 SMnC420
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
785–980 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Case Hardness HRC
58–62
Not specified
Core Hardness HB
217–277
Not specified
Elongation
≥10%
10-14 %
Yield Strength
Not specified
400-600 MPa
Hardness
Not specified
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
JIS G4053 SMnC420
Case hardened gears, shafts, cams, pins, automotive components
Can JIS G4053 SMnC420 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
JIS G4053 SMnC420 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4053 SMnC420 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can JIS G4053 SMnC420 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
JIS G4053 SMnC420 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.