Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4303 SUS316 (JIS G4303:2021) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4303 SUS316 is typically used for marine applications, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is commonly used for cutlery, turbine blades, fasteners, surgical instruments.
JIS G4303 SUS316 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4303 SUS316 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 66.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4303 SUS316
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Tensile Strength
≥520 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
≥205 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥40%
≥18%
Hardness
≤187 HB
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
36–45 (hardened)
Typical Applications
JIS G4303 SUS316
Marine applications, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment
JIS G4303 SUS316 specifies Mo which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can JIS G4303 SUS316 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4303 SUS316 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4303 SUS316 and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4303 SUS316 specifies Mo which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can JIS G4303 SUS316 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4303 SUS316 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.