Related Material — 55.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4845 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 is typically used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware, while EN 10088-1 1.4845 is commonly used for furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4845 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 1.4301 vs EN 10088-1 1.4845 is a 83.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 55.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 1.4301
EN 10088-1 1.4845
Tensile Strength
≥520 MPa
≥515 MPa
Yield Strength
≥210 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
≥45%
≥40%
Hardness
≤215 HB
Not specified
Max Service Temp
Not specified
1100°C continuous
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
EN 10088-1 1.4845
Furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4301 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4845?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 and EN 10088-1 1.4845 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 1.4301 and EN 10088-1 1.4845?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4301 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4845?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 and EN 10088-1 1.4845 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.