Related Material — 55.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 is typically used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware, while GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is commonly used for furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications.
EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 1.4301 vs GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is a 83.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 55.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 1.4301
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Tensile Strength
≥520 MPa
≥510 MPa
Yield Strength
≥210 MPa
≥196 MPa
Elongation
≥45%
≥35%
Hardness
≤215 HB
Not specified
Max Service Temp
Not specified
1050°C
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4301 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 1.4301 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4301 be substituted with GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
EN 10088-1 1.4301 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.