Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 (EN 10088-1:2014) and ASTM A959 201 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is typically used for furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components, while ASTM A959 201 is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 201 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 1.4845 vs ASTM A959 201 is a 60.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 1.4845
ASTM A959 201
Tensile Strength
≥515 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
≥205 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥40%
Not specified
Max Service Temp
1100°C continuous
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 1.4845
Furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components
ASTM A959 201
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 201 specifies N, P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 201?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and ASTM A959 201 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 1.4845 and ASTM A959 201?
ASTM A959 201 specifies N, P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 be substituted with ASTM A959 201?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and ASTM A959 201 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.