Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 (EN 10088-1:2014) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is typically used for furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components, while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 1.4845 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 83.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 66.7%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 1.4845
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
≥515 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
≥205 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
≥40%
≥40%
Max Service Temp
1100°C continuous
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 1.4845
Furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Key Differences
GOST 5632 08X18H10 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 1.4845 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
GOST 5632 08X18H10 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.