Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 (EN 10088-1:2014) and JIS G4303 SUS304 (JIS G4303:2021) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is typically used for furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components, while JIS G4303 SUS304 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural applications.
EN 10088-1 1.4845 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while JIS G4303 SUS304 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 1.4845 vs JIS G4303 SUS304 is a 83.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 66.7%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 1.4845
JIS G4303 SUS304
Tensile Strength
≥515 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
≥205 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
≥40%
≥40%
Max Service Temp
1100°C continuous
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
≤187 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 1.4845
Furnace parts, heat exchangers, kiln components
JIS G4303 SUS304
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural applications
Key Differences
JIS G4303 SUS304 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 Be Substituted With JIS G4303 SUS304?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and JIS G4303 SUS304 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 1.4845 and JIS G4303 SUS304?
JIS G4303 SUS304 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4845.
Can EN 10088-1 1.4845 be substituted with JIS G4303 SUS304?
EN 10088-1 1.4845 and JIS G4303 SUS304 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.