Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 5522 X07Cr17 (IS 5522:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4401 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 5522 X07Cr17 is typically used for utensils, while EN 10088-1 1.4401 is commonly used for marine, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment.
IS 5522 X07Cr17 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4401 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 5522 X07Cr17 vs EN 10088-1 1.4401 is a 62.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 5522 X07Cr17
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Tensile Strength
>=450 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa
≥210 MPa
Elongation
>=20%
≥40%
Hardness
<=183 HB
≤215 HB
Condition
Annealed/softened
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 5522 X07Cr17
Utensils
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Marine, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment
Key Differences
IS 5522 X07Cr17 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4401.
EN 10088-1 1.4401 specifies Mo which is not specified for IS 5522 X07Cr17.
Can IS 5522 X07Cr17 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4401?
IS 5522 X07Cr17 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 5522 X07Cr17 and EN 10088-1 1.4401?
IS 5522 X07Cr17 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4401. EN 10088-1 1.4401 specifies Mo which is not specified for IS 5522 X07Cr17.
Can IS 5522 X07Cr17 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4401?
IS 5522 X07Cr17 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.