Minimal Match — 51.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 5522 X07Cr17 (IS 5522:2014) and GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 (GB/T 3280-2015) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 5522 X07Cr17 is typically used for utensils, while GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 is commonly used for used for kitchen equipment, food processing machinery, chemical tanks, piping, architectural panels, and fasteners..
IS 5522 X07Cr17 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China.
As per chemical composition, IS 5522 X07Cr17 vs GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 is a 77.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 51.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 5522 X07Cr17
GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10
Tensile Strength
>=450 MPa
520-720 MPa
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa
205-310 MPa
Elongation
>=20%
40-60%
Hardness
<=183 HB
187 HB max
Condition
Annealed/softened
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 5522 X07Cr17
Utensils
GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10
Used for kitchen equipment, food processing machinery, chemical tanks, piping, architectural panels, and fasteners.
Can IS 5522 X07Cr17 Be Substituted With GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10?
IS 5522 X07Cr17 and GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 5522 X07Cr17 and GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 5522 X07Cr17 be substituted with GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10?
IS 5522 X07Cr17 and GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.